Answer:
The ESA has done more good than harm because it has help to prevent total EXTINCTION and eradication of some plants and animals that might have been wiped out from there kingdom due to human use or environmental factors. Ihas also brought about recovery of palnts and animals that might have been lost
Explanation:
The ESA act has been so significant and useful to wild animals because it has prevented these animals from being wiped out or terminated from existing in the forest. It has serve as a cover law to makes this species live longer and not erased away due to environmental or human use for some purposes. The Act has also helped lots of animal and plants to come back to live due to some restrictions the law has brought in to control the extinction
First, it's associated sometimes with highly contentious theories, such as Holocaust denial. Recall the public furor in response to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 2007 speech at Columbia University, when he stated that the Holocaust didn't happen. Historians emphasize that people who deny the events of the Holocaust during World War II aren't practicing revisionist history but rather negationism. Another revisionism-related scandal occurred recently in Japan, also concerning World War II. The general of the Japanese air force authored an essay asserting that Japan was bullied into Pearl Harbor by the United States and only engaged in combat as a defensive measure. This brings up the issue of credibility that has marred the field of historical revisionism. The public tends to view revisionist theories of well-known historical incidents tied closely to its own lineage with more skepticism than those regarding more obscure events.
In the end, only a small quantity of revisionists histories are eventually accepted as fact.
Her brother loves to bike, go swimming and go to the movies.
Answer- number 1
Why- I think its number one becasue well i read the passage a couple times and that one made the most sence! Hope this helped
