Answer:
Project Tiger is a tiger conservation programme launched in April 1973 by the Government of India during Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's tenure. The project aims at ensuring a viable population of Bengal tigers in their natural habitats, protecting them from extinction, and preserving areas of biological importance as a natural heritage forever represented as close as possible the diversity of ecosystems across the distribution of tigers in the country. The project's task force visualized these tiger reserves as breeding nuclei, from which surplus animals would migrate to adjacent forests. Funds and commitment were mustered to support the intensive program of habitat protection and rehabilitation under the project.[1] The government has set up a Tiger Protection Force to combat poachers and funded relocation of villagers to minimize human-tiger conflicts.
During the tiger census of 2006, a new methodology was used extrapolating site-specific densities of tigers, their co-predators and prey derived from camera trap and sign surveys using GIS. Based on the result of these surveys, the total tiger population was estimated at 1,411 individuals ranging from 1,165 to 1,657 adult and sub-adult tigers of more than 1.5 years of age.[2] Owing to the project, the number of tigers increased to 2,603–3,346 individuals by 2018.[
Answer:
Emotion was sad and depress
Yes, all three make up the triangle of persuasion.
Examples can be:
Ethos~ An advertisement on an alternative medicine persuaded to be efficient by the credibility of scientists in lab coats.
Pathos~ A commercial asking for donations to help abused animals to appeal to the emotional view.
Logos~ A statistic in a magazine about rates of how people with more shoes are more happy, suggesting you should buy shows for this reason.
Although all examples have bad motives for persuading, ways to avoid being tricked in these examples are:
-In ethos ex., people with lab coats aren't necessarily credible, look them up and see if they are legitimate, and if they are, look at what they are saying and if it is even relatable to the subject.
-In pathos ex., how did this commercial even get the money to be advertised? If they have money, they should use it to support the animals. Think before donating money to a program like this, because most of time, more than half the money you donate goes to them then the ones in need.
-In logos, the statistics are correct, but if you are depressed, it doesn't mean you should buy more shoes. There is a hidden variable in their data
I hope this helps?
Unkempt and smelly is the answer
