1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
6

What was the impact of the racial structure of the spanish colonial period on post- colonial mexico?

History
1 answer:
blondinia [14]3 years ago
5 0
Before Spanish colonization, Mexico has established its own class structure among the population. However, after colonization, the class structure changed drastically. The Spanish elites imposed a caste system with different levels of biological mixtures between different ethnic groups living in Mexico which decided one's status in society. Those who were biologically more Spanish enjoy a better standard of life than those from Indigenous or African lineage. The strict hierarchy caused discontent among the people which led to civil unrest and an inevitable revolution.
You might be interested in
This map shows the location of communist governments after WWII.
ASHA 777 [7]

The correct answer is B.

The Korean War was fought between 1950 and 1953. It was considered a proxy war in the major conflict known as Cold War, that confronted the Eastern bloc of communist countries leaded by the URSS and the Western bloc of capitalist countries headed by the US.

When the Korean War started, the country had splitted in two halves and North Korea attempted to invade South Korea. The communist North was supported by the URSS and China while the South was supported by the US.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the impact of British colonial rule on India
Olenka [21]
British Colonial Rule: Impact # 1.
Destruction of Indian Handicrafts:
The Industrial Revolution in England created a serious impact on Indian economy as it reversed the character and composition of India’s foreign trade. This led to destruction of Indian handicrafts although there was no substantial growth of modern factory industry.
The factors which were responsible for the gradual decay of Indian handicrafts were—disappearance of princely courts and their patronage, aggressive trade policy of the East India Company and the British Government, increasing competition of British machine—made goods and increasing demand for Western commodities as a result of foreign influence.
The destruction of Indian handicrafts created a vacuum in Indian markets which was subsequently fed by British manufactured goods. The destruction of Indian handicrafts led to serious unemployment problem and the weavers were most seriously affected.
Moreover, this unemployed craftsmen and artisans could not find any alternative occupation open to them and thus they had to return to agricultural sector leading to ‘progressive ruralisation of India’. Thus, this dependence of population on agriculture gradually increased from 55 per cent in 1901 to 72 per cent in 1931 and this led to progressive sub-division and fragmentation of agricultural holdings.
British Colonial Rule: Impact # 2.
New Land System:
New land system of the British ruler also created a serious impact on the Indian economy. During the East India Company rule, the company administrators imposed land revenue at exorbitant rates and thereby realised larger returns from land.
Thereafter, the British Government introduced the land settlement in 1793. Permanent settlement was introduced in Bengal and other neighbouring areas, and then gradually extended to other states. This settlement led to introduction of zamindary system where zamindars were responsible for collecting and remitting the land revenue to the British rulers.
Later on, another system known as ryotwary settlement was also introduced in Bombay and Madras and then subsequently to north­eastern and north-western India where peasant landlords were directly responsible to the state for the annual payment of land revenue.
Under both these systems, the land revenue or the rent fixed was excessively high and this led to destruction of the organic village community in India.
In this connection, Daniel and Alice Thorner wrote, “Whereas the zamindary system made the landlords masters of the village communities, the Ryotwary system cut through the heart of the village communities by making separate arrangement between each peasant cultivator and the state”.
Thus the new land system of the British created a class of absentee landlords making way for exploitation of the peasants. Thus both the zamindary system and the Ryotwary system introduced by the British led to the concentration of economic power in the hands of few. This resulted total depression in agriculture and industry.

British Colonial Rule: Impact # 3.
Commercialisation of Agriculture:
Commercialisation of Indian agriculture during the British period created a serious impact on the Indian economy. Commercialisation of agriculture indicates production of various crops not for home consumption but for sale. Industrial revolution in Britain had raised the demand for agro-raw-materials, especially raw cotton, jute, sugarcane, groundnuts etc. for British industries.
As the British industries were offering higher prices for commercial crops the peasants gradually started to shift their cropping pattern substituting commercial crops for food crops. In some areas commercialisation of agriculture reached to such an extent that the peasants even could not produce food crops for their home consumption and started to purchase foodstuff from the mandis.
Moreover, the development of irrigation also intensified the commercialisation of agriculture in India.
British Colonial Rule: Impact # 4.
Development of Railway Network:
The development of an elaborate railway network primarily intensified the commercialisation of agriculture and on the other hand brought foreign machine made manufactures to India. This sharpened the competition of machine made goods with Indian handicrafts which resulted into total destruction of Indian handicrafts industry.
.

4 0
3 years ago
What country came out of ww1 in better shape
pychu [463]
America as they didn’t lose much soldiers because they entered late
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the biggest difference between government in ancient Athens and in ancient Rome?
stealth61 [152]
Athens allowed all citizens to vote, Rome was just republic !
7 0
3 years ago
Buddha believed the only way to find truth was to
kodGreya [7K]

live peacefully and work dillengentally


5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After world war 1 both italy and japan expected more
    12·1 answer
  • Which country surrendered to the vietminh during the siege of dien bien phu?
    11·2 answers
  • Before his appointment to the vice presidency, gerald ford--who became president on richard nixon's resignation and was the nati
    13·1 answer
  • SERIOUSLY NEED HELP HOT 10 MINUTES LEFT!! PLS HELP I WILL GIVE BRANLIEST!! AT LEAST COME TAKE A LOOK!!! MY FINAL QUESTIONS!SERIO
    11·1 answer
  • How did discrimination against african americans in the north differ from discrimination in the south?
    15·1 answer
  • A historian researching the motives of the perpetrators of the Holocaust would find which of the following
    15·1 answer
  • It took what for the US to stop children working in factories?
    10·1 answer
  • Why do some people want to change their government
    11·2 answers
  • Established by the British, this unpopular act placed a tax on all printed materials including wills and all important documents
    14·1 answer
  • how did the 13th amendment affect the relationship between the states & the national government and/or the relationship betw
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!