I think that they would vary because the Taino people ate, dressed, looked, and had a different lifestyle than the Europeans. Also the Europeans may say that what they are doing is exploring or looking for India. While the Taino will say that they are taking over their land and rights. Also the way that they ate things such as potatoes may differ. There were different perspectives that the Europeans had about the Taino and vice versa. You can relate to this somewhat by thinking you went exploring and come across this area of land where people are and you decide to explore it. You find that these people are different from you and that you are different from them from the way they look to the way they eat. You think that what your lifestyle is correct while the other people think theirs is correct. That is somewhat similar to the Europeans and Taino.
Hope this helps!
Can u plz mark me as brainliest? I really need it!
There were many anti-communist leaders during this time who unfortunately looked to Mussolini for political inspiration, although the most famous would have probably been Hitler.
Answer:
Clark sees the Lakota people as savages not only because he considers their way of living as less developed than his own, but because the racist organization of the society was a requirement for the colonialist endeavor.
Explanation:
Although assimilation was the official government policy, the natives never really got the promised chance to preserve their way of life as long as they could adapt to new demands. The real goal was to take the natives' lands, and that could only be accomplished by spreading paternalistic and racist ideas such as the belief that the natives were savages.
The non associators wereThe Colonists who broke away from the Mother Country. The ones who did stay with England were known as the Loyalists (associators)
