The structure of FDR's fireside chat is effective. This is evident from the similarities he is drawing between the actions of Japan and the actions of Germany. His goal in drawing these parallels is to show the American people that war is necessary to stop Japan from continuing their reign of terror. Along with this, the US must defend their honor after being attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor.
Ultimately, FDR central idea that the Japanese need to be stopped before they continue to attack other innocent nations is well explained and uses multiple examples to show that this trend can continue unless America stops them.
<span>The societies of Paleolithic man were far different then that of the Neolithic man. The Old Stone Age societies had no time for other actives then what was necessary to survive. They did not invent many new things, and were constantly moving and changing their environment. Societies in he New Stone Age were a settled people, who constantly improved their lifestyle’s to make it easier to live by. Job's of the women no longer consisted of gathering, it consisted of growing the crops, since agriculture was a new provider of food. In conclusion, the lives of the people living in the Paleolithic and the Neolithic time period were different in many ways and a like also. Through the improvements in technology, education, and culture they were able to enhance the quality of life throughout these two periods. As man’s mind increased, it led into the new age, and the start of what may be civilization, as we know it.</span>
One thing was that Seas were sometimes difficult to navigate which limited communication - D. this was already a factor which limited the possibility of one united Greece emergin because it made it very difficult to talk to these isolated islands that couldbe found through the difficult-to-navigate seas.
Another thing was that C - some city-states were located on isolated islands.
He tried to cut federal budget, tried to reduce federal debt, and he decreased the size of government departments.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The information in the question is correct.
Internet access in Africa is on average, much lower than in Europe, and the rest of the world.
In some African countries like Eritrea, Burundi and Somalia, less than 2% of the total population have access to the internet, while Iceland, an European country, has an internet coverage of 100% of its population.
This low internet penetration in Africa is related to other socioeconomic variables such as lower per capita incomes, lower economic development, and higher social conflictivity.
