Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer:
The answer is C.Local credit union
Explanation:
Firstly, Carlos owns a small, local business, so using the Fed would be unpractical (by the way I'm sure the Federal Reserve is the wrong answer because I took the test and it said so). Wall Street is a symbol for the U.S. financial markets, not an actual corporation that he could use to raise money; its figurative. Using the stock market would mean that Carlos would have to sell some ownership of his business so he can make money. In summary, your best answer is C. Local Credit Union.
The kind of military force that the confederation government have can be best described as a weak one. They were not able to force citizens to join the military and this made the military weak. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has come to your desired help
29 years of age
Ignore what i wrote down there v
Please leave thanks
