Answer:
They did not participate in World War 1. But in World War 2 they joined because of alliances they had with the USA.
Explanation:
No, of course it is a great thing to do for your country and a wonderful sacrifice but you still have a family and you can still be a true citizen by making other sacrifices to your country and playing other rolls. there are tons of things that our country needs and other sacrifices you can make that fit you better. becoming a soldier is not for every one and it has got to be in your heart to do it you have to have to want to gain the skills and want to do it well. although I am not discouraging any one to it I'm just saying you need to have the heart to play that roll in your country. so no it I would not think that.
Truman’s policy was more defensive than offensive. This can be seen in the Marshall Plan where
he used economic to rebuild war-torn as an incentive to promote democracy. Though he would not use military force, He
vowed to support countries against communism and this was seen in the establishment
of NATO as a deterrent to Russian expansion.
Well, the most important effect of nationalism in Europe in 1900s was the World Wars. Citizens of many countries were unhappy with the economy and the way things were in their states. This, along to the critical approach towards other nations and the growing national socialism led to the outbreak of military conflicts, pogroms, and eventually the holocaust and facism during the World War II. One important thing is that were talking here about very extreme nationalism.
The answer is number 1. The Sahara's increasing dryness and spreading desert made relocation necessary. Although the Sahara is ice cold at night, its spreading has changed juristically throughout the years, its dryness stays the same from day to night.
