<u>Answer:</u>
None
<u>Explanation:</u>
-3(2+7) = -3×9 = -27
-6+21 = 15
-21+6 = -15
Hence there is no equivalence
Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
In statistics, the probability of both an event A and an event B happening is equal to the probability of A happening multiplied by the probability of event B happening.
Let's say spinning a prime number is event A and rolling a number ≤ 4 is event B.
There are 8 possibilities on an eight equal segment spinner, and there are 4 prime numbers between 1 and 8 (including 8), which are 2, 3, 5, and 7. This means that the probability of spinning a prime number is 4/8, or 1/2
There are 6 possibilities on a die, and there are 4 possibilities of rolling a 4 or less (1, 2, 3, 4). Therefore, the probability of rolling 4 or less on a die is 4/6, or 2/3
The probability of both of these happening can be calculated by multiplying these together, so 1/2 * 2/3 = 2/6 = 1/3
The answer is 2,2
as 3*2 - 2 = 4
ans 2*2 +2 = 4
So it satisfies both eqautions
400/2 = 200
200 + 20 = 220
200 - 20 = 180
Answer: He had gone 220 miles.
He was 180 miles from the finish and 220 from the start, so he was 40 miles closer to the finish than to the start.
It makes a zig zag across the graph so i think none of the above
