The correct answer for this question is "<span> b. the magna carta limited the power of absolute monarchy, while william the conqueror's invasion had expanded it." The answer is the</span> statement that accurately describes a difference between english politics under the magna carta and those established just after william the <span>conqueror's invasion of england.</span>
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
The Macedonian Empire existed and fell apart before the establishment of the Byzantine Empire, but that doesn't mean that these two empires don't have any connection, on the contrary, the Macedonian Empire actually contributed a lot to the development of the Byzantine Empire. As mentioned, the Macedonian Empire fell apart, or rather was conquered, but the Macedonian dynasties remained, and later their descendants. These Macedonians actually created a period known as the Macedonian Dynasty, which was a period in Byzantium when several Macedonian rulers were the emperors. These rulers of the Macedonian Dynasty were actually the ones that made Byzantium great and strong. They implemented lot of reforms, with the result being increase in the production of goods, stimulating greater demand, and encouraging trade, leading to economic boom. Also, the cities started to become larger, more beautiful, and better organized, while the population was also on the rise because of the improved living conditions. The education and knowledge were encouraged as well, so more and more of the population was becoming educated and had much better understanding of the world. This period is also referred to as the ''Macedonian Renaissance''.
Answer:
It will be the third one No#3
Explanation:
The united states was neutral at the beginning of most wars
