What does it mean to see through the immaigrates eyes

1 answer:

4 0

To look through someone eyes, means to look at their point of view, or their side of the story.
in this example, it uses an immigrate's (you spelled it wrong), so depending on the event this immigrate is in, will effect their point of view (happy, sad, scared, etc.)
hope this helps!
:)

You might be interested in

Compare Zaroff’s and Rainsford’s point of view on the hunt. How does this tension contribute to the moral stakes of the story?

stiks02 [169]

Answer and Explanation:

Zaroff and Rainsford are characters in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game". The whole story revolves around what is moral and what is not, as well as the characters' ability to empathize with others.

It is interesting to notice that Rainsford and Zaroff are more similar than they are different. They are both skilled hunters who also happen to be quite arrogant about their profession. Both fail to empathize with their prey. However, this is where the difference begins and ends. Rainsford hunts wild animals. He does not think of a jaguar's feelings when he fires his gun to kill it.

Zaroff, on the other hand, hunts men. He knows very well he is hunting rational beings like himself. But he does not care. He sees the men he hunts as inferior to him, just like Rainsford sees the animals as mere huntees. Yet, Rainsford is incapable of condoning with Zaroff's behavior and perception. To Rainsford, what Zaroff does is pure muder.

This tension and the conflict this difference generates are what advances the plot. Both hunters have similar views, only one of them has taken it to the next level. Is only Zaroff wrong? Are both of them murderers? Is Rainsford a better men simply because he has a different sense of moral when it comes to other human beings, but no moral when it comes to animals? Thus, the moral stakes of the story make us wonder and question the characters.

6 0

4 years ago

Yo quiz time help pls

Vlada [557]

Describe Mary Maloney's feelings towards her husband. How do her different actions demonstrate the emotions and feelings that she has for her husband?

Answer: Mary seems to be happy with her husband, at least at the beginning of the story.

Explanation:

Roald Dahl's 'Lamb to the Slaughter' tells a story about Mary Maloney, a pregnant woman who murders her husband Patrick when he announces that he will leave her.

Mary Maloney seems to be satisfied with her marriage, at least at the beginning of the story. As stated in the text, Mary's world seems to be centered around her husband:

"She [...] was content to sit quietly, enjoying his company after the long hours alone in the house."

Mary is portrayed as a woman who loved her husband for different reasons:

"She loved him for the way he sat loosely in a chair, for the way he came in a door, or moved slowly across the room with long strides..."

How is Patrick Maloney, the husband, acting when he arrives home? How is this different from his normal behavior, and what does his strange behavior foreshadow (hint at)?

Answer: Patrick Maloney drinks heavily when he arrives home. He is not as communicative as he usually is. This behavior foreshadows that he has some news for his wife, which she will not be happy to hear.

Explanation:

Foreshadowing is a literary device in which the author gives the readers certain clues about what will happen later in the story.

In "Lamb to the Slaughter", Patrick Maloney returns home and everything seems as usual, until he starts to drink a lot of alcohol. He barely talks to his wife, giving short answers to what Mary says. This behavior indicates that Patrick has certain news to share with his wife, and that he expects that she will not be happy when she hears it. He wants to leave his pregnant wife, and is aware that there is a difficult conversation in front of them.

5 0

4 years ago

Satish was standing on the balcony watching the last rays of the sun. Loud and angry voices in the street below distracted his a

Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

A laugh stops pointless argument.

Explanation:

The story of Satish is all about a community who is not wise and quarrels with each other on little disagreements. Satish saw two people fighting over their preferences of Idli or Dosa. Every person has his own food choices according to his taste but here people seems to disagree with the facts and starts arguing on pointless topics. There comes another man who thinks he is wise but makes a statement Dosa with chocolate, and here the argument continues. The only thing that helped stop the pointless arguments among the people of community was Satish's unintended laugh. The title that best suits the story is "A laugh stops pointless argument".

7 0

3 years ago

I have a question about the difference between a Hat and a Cap in North America? I mean like I just recently moved to Canada and

grin007 [14]

In America, the picture on the right is called a baseball cap and the picture on the left is called a hat. However, I personally call them both hats. In your situation, it sounds like they are referring to the picture on the right.

I hope this helps.

5 0

3 years ago

What kind of meter does Emily Dickinson use in her poem "Because I Could Not Stop for Death"?

Vladimir79 [104]

Anapestic trimeter would be the kind of meter Emily Dickinson uses

4 0

4 years ago