1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
14

Under the feudal system, a higher noble granted land to a lower noble in exchange for:

History
2 answers:
marshall27 [118]3 years ago
8 0
<span>D. an oath of loyalty. </span>
Westkost [7]3 years ago
3 0
Hey there budd!

This was actually known to be an exchange for an oath of loyalty. So, when the the feudal system, a higher noble granted land to a lower noble in exchange for <span>an oath of loyalty which would signify giving for free, sense it would be known as being loyal and actually recognizing what it needed to be done.

Hope this helps you budd! </span><span />
You might be interested in
In which form of government could all citizens participate directly in the government?
Kruka [31]
It would be in a "direct democracy" in which all citizens participate directly in the government, since they would vote on each individual matter directly instead of electing representatives to vote for them. 
8 0
3 years ago
Which religion or philosophy accepts the belief in reincarnation?
igomit [66]

Answer:

Hinduism

Explanation:

Amustycow

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the 5th president
Marianna [84]

James Monroe was the 5th president of the US. He ran from 1817 to 1825.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List and explain at least 2 of Cardinal Richelieu’s 4 points and explain their importance to France?
kvasek [131]

Answer:

bruh

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Pick one of the summaries and tell us what that piece of media revealed about how Americans felt about the Cold War. Do you thin
bezimeni [28]
War Games was just playing on AMC this past weekend. I believe that the sentiment expressed by this film, that there are no winners in a full scale nuclear war, is grounded in fact and not emotions. We already have the example of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to tell us about the devastation possible and the bombs developed later were many times more powerful. Mutual assured destruction was what kept the US and Soviet Union from attacking each other. People had a right to be afraid. We learned that in 1983 the world had a near-miss with nuclear war, when a Russian soldier ignored a false alarm (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov) and did not give orders or launch a counter-strike on the USA. We may never know how many times we were on the brink of global destruction.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the late 19th century, productivity rose for all of the following reasons except:
    9·1 answer
  • Which event in history is seen by many people as the beginning of the Great Depression?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did some americans (both north and south) oppose equality for all african americans?
    10·1 answer
  • What called for a gradual withdrawal of u.s. troops in vietnam?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following Enlightenment principles from Rousseau is evident in the U.S. Constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • What wasn’t an advantage the north had during the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • What did Europeans have in great supply as a result of their territories
    15·1 answer
  • What was the immediate effect of Henry VIII’s decision to have the Bible translated into English?
    6·2 answers
  • Explain what highlighted the need for a strong national government during the times of the Articles of Confederation:
    5·1 answer
  • What information does the Preamble provide?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!