1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8_murik_8 [283]
3 years ago
10

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

History
2 answers:
DerKrebs [107]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.

Explanation: took the test

sergiy2304 [10]3 years ago
3 0
In general, secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide, and to engage with, other perspectives about a primary source or a certain historical event.
You might be interested in
How did Congress attempt to solve the dispute over the organization of the Nebraska Territory?
11111nata11111 [884]

It split Nebraska into 2 Distinct territories: Nebraska and Kansas

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibited
VARVARA [1.3K]
The answer is D slavery
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes serfs?
Sveta_85 [38]

Correct answer is: C. The lowest-level vassal in a feudal system.

Under Feudalism, there was a peasant status called Serfdom.  Serfs were bound and tied to the land, if sold they came with it. It was not slavery itself, but under the feudalism they were definitely the lowest form of "tenant" of the land.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the1870 groups of women began marching from church meetings to nearby saloons. They knelt in prayier on the saloons floor or
snow_tiger [21]
I believe it is because they supported abstinence from alcohol
5 0
4 years ago
The War Powers Act, passed in 1973, was a measure by Congress intended to
Andrews [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

The War Powers Resolution (also known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 or the War Powers Act) (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) is a federal law intended to check the U.S. president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of the U.S. Congress

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Evaluate the extent to which human activity has caused changes in the environment, resulting in global responses in the period f
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the pope urban ll call for a crusade in 1095
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Confederate states justify secession?
    10·1 answer
  • Which text is essential to the practice of Islam?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following states joined the Confederacy?
    15·2 answers
  • Ano ano ang dahilan ng pagtuklas ng mga kaharian ng europa sa iba pang lupain​?
    5·1 answer
  • 1
    9·1 answer
  • What was ironic about african americans fighting for democracy during world war 1?
    9·1 answer
  • I need HELP right now!!! (History)
    12·2 answers
  • How did sparta build it's military society​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!