The idea of total war existed in all countries involved in World War I. For example, countries used------- to determine how much
food, rubber, gasoline, and other items each citizen could use during the war. In order to draft more soldiers into the military, many of the nations established a policy of mandatory------------- . Some countries also controlled public opinion during the war by using --------to prevent discouraging news from reaching the public
The idea of total war existed in all countries involved in World War I. For example, countries used rationing to determine how much food, rubber, gasoline, and other items each citizen could use during the war. In order to draft more soldiers into the military, many of the nations established a policy of mandatory conscription. Some countries also controlled public opinion during the war by using censorship to prevent discouraging news from reaching the public.
Explanation:
Rationing was a constant in all warring countries, especially the European countries, which were being destroyed by the conflict. The objective of rationing was to avoid the total shortage of products and to enable the government to control resources.
Compulsory recruitment became a rule in Europe during the First World War. With compulsory recruitment, men were required to enlist in the army of their country and ensure that the country had enough soldiers.
All warring countries create propaganda and censorship offices. To reinforce national sentiment, to demonize the enemy, to raise the morale of troops and civilians with permanent "brainwashing": in connection with censorship, propaganda had a formidable development in World War I, becoming a real strategic weapon.
The movement of poor Irish immigrants to the United States in the 1800s is an illustration of the push factor of famine and the pull factor of food availability. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or the penultimate option. I hope that the answer helped you.
There is a great possibility that the end result of the war was different. For the entry of the United States into the war for victory was providential. If the United States had not entered, perhaps we would live in a different world now, if we consider the importance of the American entry into the war and all of its power in helping its allies to win.
No, it is generally false that the <span>Civil Rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s did not do much to help African-Americans, since in fact there were many laws passed during this time that made the lives of African Americans better. </span>