Answer:
Experimenter, participant
Explanation:
Experimenter expectancy effects can be described or considered as an error in the scientific findings or inquiries, where the researchers' expectations concerning their enquiries or findings are made known unconsciously to the subjects or participant, and this will automatically influence their responses.
This is also known as the object expectancy effect.
The subject or participant expectancy effect occurs when the result being expected by the participants or subjects unconsciously affect the expected result.
It should be noted that the experimental expectancy effect can be prevented by double-blind design. Double-blind design is a situation where both the experimenter and the participant do not know the subject identity.
The participant expectancy effect can be prevented by a single-blind design, where the subject is not aware if he/she is the experimental test object.
Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
<u>Answer</u>:
The sociologist is most likely a structural Functionalist.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- The theories that the sociologist mentioned in the question is studying relates the most to the structural functionalism theory of sociology.
- The structural functionalism theory states that the society is seen as a whole to be built of many parts that work together in harmony.
- Here, the sociologist is trying to study how the movement and change in one part of the system leads to change in other parts of the same system, which closely relates to the theory of structural functionalism suggesting society as a combination of various parts working together.
Answer:
A. passing a new tax law such as stamp act and tea act
Answer:
Works
Explanation:
I hope this helps you!!!!.........