1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
3 years ago
13

What can happen if the president chooses to veto a law that has been approved? The law returns to being introduced in one of the

houses. The president’s decision can be overridden by a majority of Congress. The law is rejected and cannot be reconsidered. The president’s decision is scheduled for review within a year.
History
2 answers:
zepelin [54]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is: the president's decision can be overridden by a majority of Congress.

A veto ( from Latin <em>I forbid</em> ) is the power to officially stop an enactment of legislation.

In the United States, every bill, order, act or resolution approved by Congress must be presented to the President for their approval.

The President has 10 days to sign the bill. If he refuses to sign it, he returns it to the Congress with a statement of objection. <em>This is his veto.</em>

Congress considers the objection. Each House may vote to override the President's veto. <em>If 2/3 of each House agree to override it, the bill becomes law.</em>

oksano4ka [1.4K]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is B) The president’s decision can be overridden by a majority of Congress.

What can happen if the president chooses to veto a law that has been approved is that the president’s decision can be overridden by a majority of Congress.

One of the most relevant points in the United States government is the separation of powers. Under the system of checks and balances, none branch is more powerful than the other or can override the power of another branch. In this case, the executive branch -the President of the US- has the power to veto a law. But this decision can be overridden if there is a majority in Congress. So the Judicial branch, the legislative branch, and the executive branch check each other to maintain the balance of power in the country.

You might be interested in
Select three effects of increased government regulation:​
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

Option A , B, D

Explanation:

In simple words, when the government increase the regulation on markets the interest for lending and borrowing also decreases to make sure that the poor ones could also use the money. Thus, resulting in decrease in housing prices.

The government will also regulate the prices of commodities so that everyone can enjoy the utilities of commodities and hence leading to lower corporate profits.

However, to fund the above two operations the government will need to have finance which will be done by increasing the taxes.

8 0
2 years ago
Encyclopedia of American Writers. 2002 ed. Wong, Samantha. "Dunbar, Paul Laurence."
kupik [55]

The answer is D since it starts with the author's name

7 0
3 years ago
What did president Johnson do with this land during reconstruction?
Liula [17]

Answer:

Northern anger over the assassination of Lincoln and the immense human cost of the war led to demands for punitive policies. Vice President Andrew Johnson had taken a hard line and spoke of hanging Confederates, but when he succeeded Lincoln as president, Johnson took a much softer position, pardoning many Confederate leaders and former Confederates.[78] Former Confederate President Jefferson Davis was held in prison for two years, but other Confederate leaders were not. There were no trials on charges of treason. Only one person—Captain Henry Wirz, the commandant of the prison camp in Andersonville, Georgia—was executed for war crimes. Andrew Johnson's conservative view of Reconstruction did not include the involvement of blacks or former slaves in government and he refused to heed Northern concerns when Southern state legislatures implemented Black Codes that set the status of the freedmen much lower than that of citizens.[9]

Smith argues that "Johnson attempted to carry forward what he considered to be Lincoln's plans for Reconstruction."[79] McKitrick says that in 1865 Johnson had strong support in the Republican Party, saying: "It was naturally from the great moderate sector of Unionist opinion in the North that Johnson could draw his greatest comfort."[80] Billington says: "One faction, the moderate Republicans under the leadership of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson, favored a mild policy toward the South."[81] Lincoln biographers Randall and Current argued that:

It is likely that had he lived, Lincoln would have followed a policy similar to Johnson's, that he would have clashed with congressional Radicals, that he would have produced a better result for the freedmen than occurred, and that his political skills would have helped him avoid Johnson's mistakes.[82]

Historians generally agree that President Johnson was an inept politician who lost all his advantages by unskilled maneuvering. He broke with Congress in early 1866 and then became defiant and tried to block enforcement of Reconstruction laws passed by the U.S. Congress. He was in constant conflict constitutionally with the Radicals in Congress over the status of freedmen and whites in the defeated South.[83] Although resigned to the abolition of slavery, many former Confederates were unwilling to accept both social changes and political domination by former slaves. In the words of Benjamin Franklin Perry, President Johnson's choice as the provisional governor of South Carolina: "First, the Negro is to be invested with all political power, and then the antagonism of interest between capital and labor is to work out the result."[84]

However, the fears of the mostly conservative planter elite and other leading white citizens were partly assuaged by the actions of President Johnson, who ensured that a wholesale land redistribution from the planters to the freedmen did not occur. President Johnson ordered that confiscated or abandoned lands administered by the Freedmen's Bureau would not be redistributed to the freedmen but would be returned to pardoned owners. Land was returned that would have been forfeited under the Confiscation Acts passed by Congress in 1861 and 1862.

Explanation:

hope this helps you please mark me as brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
The dog was chasing the cat. (PASSIVE OR ACTIVE)​
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

Active :The dog chased the cat.

Passive:The cat was chased by the dog.

7 0
3 years ago
What does it mean to follow the Eightfold Path? traveling to India for a religious trip once in one’s lifetime living based on t
kramer

Answer:

B on edge 2020 history

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What democratic principle does this diagram reflect?
    6·1 answer
  • though the population of Arab Southwest Asia is small. this region still plays an important part in world affairs. Why?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the norman invasion of 1066 on the english culture open study?
    14·1 answer
  • Does Andrew Carnegie believe that there is anything wrong with amassing wealth?
    10·1 answer
  • Pre-colonial african marriage systems allow for the practice of
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms best describes the World War I-era poster seen below? A. Fascism
    10·2 answers
  • The National Republicans believed in
    11·1 answer
  • At the end of WWII why was Joseph Stalin angry with the United States
    5·1 answer
  • Think about why americans were so scared of communism. Is it possible for americans to follow someone like McCarthhy Today? 2-4
    12·1 answer
  • What is a characteristic of a market economy?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!