Your answer is Graph A :)
<h3>Answer:</h3>
Yes, ΔPʹQʹRʹ is a reflection of ΔPQR over the x-axis
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The problem statement tells you the transformation is ...
... (x, y) → (x, -y)
Consider the two points (0, 1) and (0, -1). These points are chosen for your consideration because their y-coordinates have opposite signs—just like the points of the transformation above. They are equidistant from the x-axis, one above, and one below. Each is a <em>reflection</em> of the other across the x-axis.
Along with translation and rotation, <em>reflection</em> is a transformation that <em>does not change any distance or angle measures</em>. (That is why these transformations are all called "rigid" transformations: the size and shape of the transformed object do not change.)
An object that has the same length and angle measures before and after transformation <em>is congruent</em> to its transformed self.
So, ... ∆P'Q'R' is a reflection of ∆PQR over the x-axis, and is congruent to ∆PQR.
Answer:X=-37
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-2040
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of the first 8 terms is -2040.
Answer:
(0, - 4 )
Step-by-step explanation:
under a counterclockwise rotation about the origin of 180°
a point (x, y ) → (- x, - y ), hence
C(2, 4) → (- 2, - 4)
A translation of 2 units to the right means add 2 to the original x- coordinate while the y-coordinate remains unchanged.
(- 2, - 4 ) → (- 2 + 2, - 4 ) → (0, - 4 )
