Answer:
There is no short answer.
Explanation:
The mentioned decision was about whether the corporations and unions can or can not contribute financially to the campaigns of the politicians they want to support as long as the corporations themselves are independent of the campaigns.
One of the strongest disagreements to this was that this action was going to allow the corporations to flood selected politicians' campaigns with money, maybe corporations outside of US.
One of the arguments that agree with the decision was that the corporations also have a right of free speech including supporting their chosen political candidates even though corporations are not individual people.
I hope this answer helps.
When working on a major project, brainstorming topic ideas is not a good step for keeping the overall scope in mind
Answer:
They had representation in Parliament but not in the colonies
Explanation:
Remember the saying, "No taxation without representation!" It was colonists saying that the taxes were unfair because they did not have anyone to represent or fight for them on Parliament.
They experienced illness, the cold winter and shortages of supplies
