Answer:
The answer to your question is C.
The explanation for Option C:- raise an objection to his own opinion and counter that argument is:
On May 31, 1988 President Ronald Reagan addressed the students and faculty at Moscow State University (MSU). Although previous presidents desired such an opportunity, no other U.S. president except Richard M. Nixon had stood east of the Berlin Wall and spoken directly to the citizens of the Soviet Union. That Reagan would have such an opportunity was highly unlikely. Reagan appeared to be an implacable foe of the Soviet Union, previously calling it an "evil empire," describing it as "the focus of evil in the modern world," and accusing the Soviet "regime" of being "barbaric."
Thus, Reagan equated freedom with progress. Specifically, his thesis argued that human rights equal individual freedom; freedom equals individual creativity; individual creativity equals technological progress. The essence of the argument in Reagan's MSU address can be summarized as it follows:
There is a revolution taking place. It is spreading around the globe.
Hope this helps! :3
But it’s hurts how did it come to this save meh
Answer:
E Bc He Is An Expert So It Would That
Rainy i guess hop that helps.
The excerpt from Ben Johnson's novel 'Song to Celia', which compares intoxication to love is this: BUT MIGHT I OF JOVE'S NECTAR SUP, I WOULD NOT CHANGE FOR THING.
An individual is said to be intoxicated or drunk, when such a person is in a state, in which his ability to control himself both physically and mentally has been significantly reduced as a result of drinking alcohol. The sentence given in option C compares love to intoxication; the speaker of the statement is saying that even if he could drink nectar from Jove's cup, he would rather prefer to have Celia's cup. In the novel from which this excerpt is extracted, nectar is depicted as a divine drink, the drink of the gods.
