Joseph Chamberlain's justification for the British occupation of Egypt is it creates new markets for the British economy. This is further explained below.
<h3>Who is Joseph Chamberlain?</h3>
Generally, Joseph Chamberlain, a British politician most known for his opposition to Irish self-government after he opposed home rule, was born on July 8, 1836, and died on July 2, 1914.
In conclusion, the British occupation of Egypt is justified by Joseph Chamberlain's claim that it would help the British economy.
Read more about Joseph Chamberlain
brainly.com/question/4216438
#SPJ1
The people were worried that instead of going to church on Sunday, people with automobiles would go on an all-day Sunday motor trip instead. This was the reason why they called the motor trips "threats against the church".
Explanation:
1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.
2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.
3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.
4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.
5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.
In the short term, the voyages led to the destruction of the natives of the lands that Columbus found. Some of them were killed outright. Others were enslaved. Many died of diseases brought by the Europeans.
