Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
Supported limits on working hours
or
Promoted laws against child labor
-Apex
Answer:
- Pushed for the economic growth to build a sturdy army.
- Alliance with the French to gain strength.
- Provided gin to Austrian war territory.
Hope I helped, have a great day either way!
Taft was supposed to be a progressive but soon after taking office he realized that he couldn't please the progressives and the conservatives so he chose to do what he thought was best for the country.
He tried to fix the antitrust laws and not the labor laws in the US.
I think the correct answer is true. During the renaissance, a unified italian nation did not exist not until the <span>late 19th century. Hope this answers the questions. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions. Thank you.</span>
