Hope this helps.
Judaism, Islam, and Christianity are similar because they are all three monotheistic religions— which means they all worship one supreme God as opposed to multiple— that originated in the Middle East. They also share similar core values like love of God and love of others.
They are different in a few ways: Christianity believes in a trinity (three distinct parts of one God) while Islam and Judaism both have a non-Trinitarian belief system. Judaism and Islam is based more about salvation by good works, while Christianity is about trusting Jesus as salvation. They also have different holy books, the Holy Bible, (Christianity) the Hebrew Tanakh, (Judaism) and the Quran (Islam.)
You can omit or reword things. Especially the ones between parentheses or hyphens. Those are just to help you out if you needed more context.
The principle that prevents the disclosure of information to unauthorized people, resources, and processes is the security principle of confidentiality.
<h3>What is resources?</h3>
Resource refers to the sources or the material that are god gifted and naturally present in the environment which is economically viable, technologically accessible, and culturally sustainable and that enables us to meet our needs and desires.
The confidentiality principle is meant to ensure that personal information remains private, and it can be seen by the only this information who needs it to complete their job roles.
Therefore, it can be concluded that The security concept of confidentiality prohibits the leakage of information to unauthorized individuals, resources, and procedures.
Learn more about resources here:
brainly.com/question/18448459
#SPJ4
The first session of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows:
<em>"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws ".
</em>
The language of the Constitution is very clear. Every citizen born or naturalized in the United States has the right to jurisdiction. That is, in the national territory, these people have the right to legal immunity, must enjoy freedom, property and due process of law.
In this way, states can not deny any of these groups nor withdraw their rights if there is no crime and the resulting conviction.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This relief program was dismantled by FDR after criticisms mounted that his programs were creating a class of Americans dependent on Government jobs was the Public Works Administration (PWA). It was intended to build highways, tunnels, and courthouses.
The New Deal was a series of programs created by President Franklin D. Roosevelt when he became President of the United States in 1933. These programs aimed to help the American citizens that were living under a harsh economic situation due to the Great Depression. However, Republicans and many people critiqued some programs because they thought that Roosevelt's programs were creating a class of Americans dependent on Government jobs
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
