Answer:
The answer is "The history via a Wampanoag viewpoint would look at the events from its native people's side, where account from of the settlers came from England and create the Plymouth Colony would focus at the things through William Bradford".
Explanation:
In his article, entitled Of Plymouth Plantation, William Bradford, Governor of Plymouth Colony, provided an interpretation of history. For starters, they can point at Bradford's accounts for how they consider being America's first thanksgiving. Only at beginning of Thanksgiving, the 53 English colonists belong to an original party of102 men that suffered the voyage of a trail of tears from England to Asia as well as the ensuing sickness and winter problems.
The Wampanoag were an already existing nation of many dozen settlements in the area we are already calling Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Once European nations entered this land, heretofore unrecognized germs appeared to them on this land and the Portuguese suffered a lot from disease at the time of a difficult time of its people.
The Wampanoag mentioned whenever the Europeans came that the people could provide food for the advanced weapons that the English speakers had.
Include the amount of milk to use.
it is very important to get all measurements right when making a recipe. If you don’t you could mess up the meal u were intending to make. in the paragraph, it did not give any measurements as to the milk. therefore your answer would be the last one!
hope this helps:)! Have a wonderful day!!!
Answer:
B . Rundown
Explanation:
The building is in the process of being fixed up. It can't be fixed up unless it's ( rundown )
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
