First things first, I'd call this a questionnaire rather than a problem but anyways. Your DNA profile is literally your identity, and to have that stored in the medical records would be useful in some other cases besides medical issues. It is like having a copy of your fingerprint in the government's hands. Thus one may find it useful as another way to identify someone when the need occurs. As for purposes such as to be referred for the development of personal medical treatment (I believe you're referring to project CRISPR) , is not as necessary because the way they identify mutated genes or "infected" DNA or cells is by referring it to the normal DNA found in any other cells in your body, and if cells are that easy to access, they do not have the need to keep a medical record just for your DNA sequence along with all your gene codes, especially when you are performing investigations on the same species, humans, who have the same number of chromosomes with the similar genes.
The answers are; geographical isolation and temporal isolation.
In temporal isolation, because the different species have different mating seasons, so even though their habitats overlap, they do not interbreeding is rare. Geographical isolation also plays a role because the different species are found predominantly in different sites during breeding, some in the woodland, some in the lowlands and others in streams.
D: faulting hope i could help
Wood is a renewable resource!
Answer: the answer should be 400x
Explanation: duh
