Answer:
For the first question: Your decision might change based on what you want to say since your personal ideals/culture will collide with your decision.
The second question: Your decision changes based on the person you're talking to since you don't want your opinion to hurt/offend the other person. This results in lying or hiding your true feelings. Also, the other person's opinion will influence your decision since it brings another fresh perspective to the situation.
Explanation:
Hopefully, this helps :)
To make it to the ocean was their goal
Infectious diseases were common
Fields of wild grass were everywhere
New settlements will be established in the west
I hope that a few of these may help :)
Answer:
One sharp difficulty presented itself. In the intervening twenty-five years my name had become reasonably well known.
Explanation:
In the book by John Steinbeck, <em>Travels with Charley, </em>the author describes the road trip he took in 1960 around America with his dog Charley because he wanted to have a view of his country on a more intimate level, a different perspective.
The statement that showed that there was a problem was the fact that Mr Steinbeck was quite popular and as such was recognized by quite a number of people.
In 1943, the word ‘ghetto’ was used to describe restricted areas—walled o= areas— where Jews were forced to live in Nazi Germany. Today, Twitter users use the word ‘ghetto’ about 20 times per minute as a descriptive adjective, a fact which has made many cultural commentators speak out. As you read, take notes on how the word “ghetto” has evolved over time.
[1] The word "ghetto" is an etymological mystery. Is it from the Hebrew get, or bill of divorce? From the Venetian ghèto, or foundry? From the Yiddish gehektes, "enclosed"? From Latin Giudaicetum, for "Jewish"? From the Italian borghetto, "little town"? From the Old French guect, "guard"?
In his etymology column for the Oxford University Press, Anatoly Liberman took a look at each of these possibilities. He considered ever more improbable origins — Latin for "ribbon"? German for "street"? Latin for "to throw"? — before declaring the word a stubborn mystery.
"Warsaw Ghetto Uprising" by Unknown is in the public domain.
But whatever the root language, the word's original meaning was clear: "the quarter in a city, chieQy in Italy, to which the Jews were restricted," as the OED1 puts it. In the 16th and 17th centuries, cities like Venice, Frankfurt, Prague and Rome forcibly segregated their Jewish populations, often walling them oS and submitting them to onerous2 restrictions.
By the late 19th century, these ghettos had been steadily dismantled. But instead of vanishing from history, ghettos reappeared — with a purpose more ominous3 than segregation — under Nazi Germany. German forces established ghettos in over a thousand cities across Europe. They were isolated, strictly controlled and resource-deprived — but unlike the ghettos of history, they weren't meant to last.
[5] Reviving the Jewish ghetto made genocide a much simpler project. As the Holocaust proceeded, ghettos were emptied by the trainload. The prisoners of the enormous Warsaw ghetto which at one point held 400,000 Jews, famously fought their deportation to death camps. They were outnumbered and undersupplied, but some managed to die on their own terms; thousands of Jews were killed within the walls of the ghetto, rather than in the camps.
(I'm assuming these sentences are all in past context)
1. He failed because he did not listen to the advice of his teacher.
(Adding did will maintain the past tense of the sentence)
2. He learnt that he was ill but could not go to see him.
(Changing be to was maintains the past tense. Could is past tense as can is present tense)
3. He said that he came to our house to discuss the matter.
(Came is past tense as come is present tense)
