<span>-Setting - the background, landscape. Where the story takes place.
-Protagonist - the main character who is usually has good morals
-Antagonist - villain of the story, the one that creates tension and gives bad vibes
-Point of View - the view the audience is seeing it from that might change or cause bias.
-First Person - the story is told from an individual who is directly in the story. Often you are the main character.
-Third Person - the book is told from a movie point of view. Usually the narrator is the one that unfolds the story.
-Conflict - problem or complicated situation
-Theme - a reoccurring message the author is often trying to send to the audience
-Mood - the feel of the book, the tension or happiness you feel. Mood is conveyed through words and imagery.
-Irony - the use of words that implies a meaning but actually means another. Usually for comedic, and sometimes bitter affect.
-Round Character - a character we know a lot of information about
-Flat Character - a character we know little information about
-Static Character - a character that stays the same throughout the book.
-Dynamic Character - a character that changes throughout events that happen in a book</span>
Answer:
I would choose The second and the last.
Explanation:
Answer: we must keep up with our personal hygiene.
Explanation:
We have to keep up with our personal hygiene so we don't smell bad or look bad
Answer:
<u>Claim:</u> the voting age should be lowered to 16 years old.
<u>Opposing claim:</u> some people are against it because they believe that 16 years olds can not make informed decisions and are going to vote according to whim or how their parents tell them to vote.
<u>Counterclaim:</u> lowering the voting age is more likely to produce a better-informed body of voters since school can help them with courses for such thing.
Explanation:
The claim in this text is that the voting age should be lowered since young people deserve to have a say in the direction of the country. Some of the reasons supporting this claim are that 16-year-olds are mature enough for this decision in contrast with teenagers of previous generations as shown in studies. Also, they are more informed and competent than adults.
The opposing claim states that 16 years olds are not well informed, and they will vote according to what their parents tell them to vote or without consciousness. There are no investigations in the article that support the opposing claim.
The counterclaim says that as 16-year-olds are still in school, the education system can develop instruction courses to teach them about the candidates. As they have the right to vote, students will be motivated to learn about this topic.
Quick question: what story are you referring to?
