The answer is: B. devolution
Answer: Roman Empire:
Powerful Lords Broke up the empire into separate kingdoms.
Without trade, people had to find their own food and basic necessities.
Knowledge of math and science was lost
Gupta Empire:
Hunas were absorbed into the local culture.
Invaders destroyed Hindu temples.
The feudal system began as people turned to lords for protection.
Explanation for Roman Empire. Trade in Rome ceased because all of the roads were in such horrible condition that people could not travel on them. Rome had advanced knowledge of math and science but all their notes on them were mostly destroyed or lost. Rome was divided into two parts the western and eastern kingdoms.
Explanation for Gupta Empire. Hunas began invading Gupta, (Gupta Empire was strongly and mainly Hinduism) they destroyed hindu temples and took control over the Gupta empire and were absorbed into their local culture. The Gupta empire took to feudalism in order to gain protection from foreign invasion.
Answer:
Rocks found on different mountains are different ages.
Explanation:
Radiometric dating of rocks and fossil records gives scientists an idea of the timelines of certain organisms. Fossils of long dead species found in different strata of rocks can be used to speculate the age and changes these organisms have experienced overtime.
Fossils found in the uppermost strata are indicative of organisms that died not quite long whereas fossils found in lower layers are indicate of organisms that died a long while ago. These studies also provide insight into the changes that the earth has experienced overtime.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>D. Even though slaves were still considered property, some slaves had kind masters
</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to Calhoun’s argument, the blacks were much better while serving as slaves in America than they were when they were free. This was because of racial inferiority. Since that is inferior, they are given better from the whites
Calhoun also argues that the slaves were better than free workers. This was, therefore, a common argument in the regions of the south. The slaves were better because they were treated well by their masters since the master aimed to take care of their investments.
