100 atoms is the same as how many moles?
nº atoms /avogadre number= nº of moles
100/6,022x10^23= 1,66x10^-22 moles
the molar mass is: mass/moles
we know that the molar mass of carbon 12 it's the same as his atomic number, which is 12.
So, using the previous formula:
12= mass/ 1,66x10^-22
mass= 1,992x10-21 grams of carbon 12
It was largely the Industrial Revolution that led to the growth of factories in England in the eighteenth century, since this was a time when the production of things like textiles was heavily increased.
The correct answer is “The judicial power ought to be distinct from both the legislative and executive, and independent upon both, that so it may be a check upon both, as both should be checks upon that.” – John Adams.
This would be the correct answer because in this quote John Adams highlights the idea that the independence of the judicial power allows for checks and balances between the three powers.
The term "Separation of powers" refers to a system in which a state organizes and divides responsibilities. Creating three different branches which are: the judicial power, the legislative power and the executive power. In this way each branch carries out their responsibilities independently, promoting a checks and balances system that prevents any of the branches from taking over or interrupting in the other branches' functions.
1. C) It was another reason for the United States to join the war on the side of the allies
2. B) gave allied nations control over former territories of the central power
3. B) Germans resisted the treaty since they were blamed for the war
4. C) United States
The late 19th-century United States is probably best known for the vast expansion of its industrial plant and output. At the heart of these huge increases was the mass production of goods by machines. This process was first introduced and perfected by British textile manufacturers.
In the century since such mechanization had begun, machines had replaced highly skilled craftspeople in one industry after another. By the 1870s, machines were knitting stockings and stitching shirts and dresses, cutting and stitching leather for shoes, and producing nails by the millions. By reducing labor costs, such machines not only reduced manufacturing costs but lowered prices manufacturers charged consumers. In short, machine production created a growing abundance of products at cheaper prices.
Mechanization also had less desirable effects. For one, machines changed the way people worked. Skilled craftspeople of earlier days had the satisfaction of seeing a product through from beginning to end. When they saw a knife, or barrel, or shirt or dress, they had a sense of accomplishment. Machines, on the other hand, tended to subdivide production down into many small repetitive tasks with workers often doing only a single task. The pace of work usually became faster and faster; work was often performed in factories built to house the machines. Finally, factory managers began to enforce an industrial discipline, forcing workers to work set--often very long--hours.
One result of mechanization and factory production was the growing attractiveness of labor organization. To be sure, craft guilds had been around a long time. Now, however, there were increasing reasons for workers to join labor unions. Such labor unions were not notably successful in organizing large numbers of workers in the late 19th century. Still, unions were able to organize a variety of strikes and other work stoppages that served to publicize their grievances about working conditions and wages. Even so, labor unions did not gain even close to equal footing with businesses and industries until the economic chaos of the 1930s.
