1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
4 years ago
15

In 1965, as the conflict in Vietnam intensified, the United States declared war against North Vietnam. decreased the number of U

S troops in Vietnam. escalated its troop commitment to the conflict. began defending North Vietnam against the Viet Cong.
History
2 answers:
Alika [10]4 years ago
8 0

<em><u>Answer:</u></em>

  • Escalated its troops commitment to the conflict.

<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>

In March 1965, Johnson authorized the dispatch of U.S. battle forces into fight in Vietnam. By June, 82,000 battle troops were positioned in Vietnam, and military leaders were about 175,000 more before the end of 1965.

qwelly [4]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Escalated its troop commitment to the conflict.

Explanation:

  • Johnson decided with the solid support of the American citizens. In march 1965 United states sent its armed forces into the battle in the jungles of Vietnam.
  • By the coming June, around 80000 ground forces were stationed in Vietnam and later many more soldiers were sent from the United States to Vietnam to take part in battle till the end of 1965.
You might be interested in
In what ways was racism common in both the north and the south?
s2008m [1.1K]
Segregation and blacks where the last to be hired and the first to be fired
7 0
4 years ago
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
He declared himself head of the Church of England.
stira [4]
The answer is A HENRY 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On D-Day, the Allies invaded what German stronghold?
Andreyy89
Northern france was invaded
3 0
3 years ago
How did the goals of the civil rights movement shift by the the end of the 1960s
Pani-rosa [81]
Congress had passed the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965) Southern states could no longer deprive African Americans of their equal rights 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe at least two reasons for english exploration and colonization in North america
    13·2 answers
  • What impact did locomotives have in 1800s
    13·1 answer
  • Which elected group was the earliest representative assembly in the European colonies? A. Virginia Senate B. House of Burgesses
    7·1 answer
  • What are the differences between a Spanish settlement and an English settlement
    7·1 answer
  • In what way did the introduction of interchangeable parts change labor productivity?
    11·1 answer
  • Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence about Doña Gracia.Doña Gracia was born in Portugal to a Spanish__
    11·1 answer
  • What were the opposing viewpoints that Texans debated regarding the future of their nation? Check all of the boxes that apply. a
    11·2 answers
  • Why are new intellectual ideas always controversial and difficult to accept?​
    13·1 answer
  • What are 2 ways buddhism is different from hinduism?
    9·2 answers
  • Este tipo de pinturas los seres humanos reprodujeron escenas de la vida cotidiana(como la
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!