Answer:
Explanation:
Article IV section 3 of the constitution mandates congress to vote on how a new state is to be formed. I do not know the exact terms of how a state is created as a sovereign body, but I suspect any new state would have to go through what Hawaii and Alaska went. These were territories that were not carved out of an existing state so the problem was not complicated by two states feuding over where the boundary would be.
Recently Puerto Rico had a non binding referendum on this very question. I don't know what was decided.
It's the Federal Government in the form of congress. The territory has to be in favor of statehood.
Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:
- They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.
In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.
Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:
brainly.com/question/24909197
Answer:
The answer is option D "All of these choices are correct"
Explanation:
The world war II as history has it had taken place between 1939 to 1945 and considering the given time, the war lasted for six years. The war took place between the most powerful countries of the world then which includes US, The soviet Union, Germany, France e.t.c.
All of the options highlighted were among the events that took place at the beginning of the World war II; the US military were being segregated, women also served in the Military and most African American units being commanded by white officers.
