In which defense do defendants affirm that they have reasonable grounds to believe that certain statements had no omission of material facts; Due diligence defense.
Any defendant except the issuer can assert this defense and it requires that the defendant demonstrate that she investigated the registration announcement and had reasonable grounds to believe that the registration statement become accurate and had no omission of material facts.
section 11 of the Securities Act imposes liability for underwriters, directors, and others involved with public security offerings. The statute also provides a due diligence defense for everyone, except the issuer.
Learn more about Due diligence defense here brainly.com/question/16036251
#SPJ4
The reason the power of impeachment is in the hands of the house and the responsibility for trying an impeached official in the hands of the senate instead of the judiciary branch is to create a perfect "Check and Balance."
This is because it is believed that the numbers of the Congress would make it difficult for the executive officials, particularly the President, to influence their decision, unlike the Judiciary branch.
Also, because the President appoints the Justices to the Supreme Court bench, it is assumed that some of these Justices might be loyal to the President when it comes to decision time.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that for the sake of Checks and Balances, the power of impeachment is distributed among Congress.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/191355
Answer:
This scenario most likely exemplifies <u>expectancy confirmation</u>.
Explanation:
The expectation confirmation model conceives satisfaction as the result of a contrast or comparison between the reality perceived by the individual and some type of comparison standard (expectations, norms based on experience, etc.). The propositions of the model are satisfaction is related to the degree and direction of the discrepancy between expectations and performance. Producing what has been called confirmation of expectations when the performance is initially expected, negative disconfirmation, when the performance is lower than expected, then dissatisfaction appears.
Answer:
B. Proposed a bicameral legislature with equal representation in the Senate.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise was proposed by Roger Sherman in the year 1787. The idea behind the proposal was to have a House of Representatives which was commensurate in size, as well as a Senate with equal representation.
The rise to the proposal was the lack of representation being protested by representatives who came from states that were highly populated. States with lower population on the other hand, wanted equal representation.
The idea when it was initially proposed was debated against by many but it was eventually adopted and still stands till date.
