Answer:
1. The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter. The conflict energized anti-British sentiment and paved the way for the American .
2. Tensions began to grow, and in Boston in February 1770 a patriot mob attacked a British loyalist, who fired a gun at them, killing a boy. In the ensuing days brawls between colonists and British soldiers eventually culminated in the Boston Massacre.
3.The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.
4. Skirmishes between colonists and soldiers—and between patriot colonists and colonists loyal to Britain (loyalists)—were increasingly common. His gunfire struck and killed an 11-year-old boy named Christopher Seider and further enraged the patriots.
5.John Adams agreed to defend the eight British soldiers in court, risking his political status, due to his belief in fairness of law and justice, the basic structure of laws in the United States. In the end of his battle for integrity of the law, his sacrifices were rewarded when he won the case.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
For this all you have to do is read over it and get some small facts and info, Instead of just one paragraph write 2 it will get you extra credit, but if you dont want to do that skim read it write down some facts and explain the facts.
Explanation:
Answer
Bulgaria, Turkey, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, and China
Answer:
It required the establishment of a nationwide system of public defenders
Explanation:
Very short version of what happened, Gideon was accused but had no legal knowledge and hard CASH so he served 5 years in prison and was like "ey im innocent where lawyer me?"(not an actual quote) to the supreme court and they were like yeah we should maybe give people who have no CASH a lawyer so they dont end up in jail innocent.
Can you be more specific pls
