1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastaziya [24]
2 years ago
12

How do laws in the south prove that slaves are human beings

History
1 answer:
erica [24]2 years ago
6 0

Three-Fifth Compromise is your answer

In an effort to garner more congressional members, the South came out with the <em>Three-Fifth Compromise</em>, which means that slaves count as 3/5 of a person, which can greatly increase the population of the South.

~

You might be interested in
Tell about early human migration
taurus [48]

Earliest human migrations and expansions of archaic and modern humans across continents began two million years ago with the migration out of Africa of Homo erects. 

<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the meaning of segregation as used in the sentence:
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

the separation or isolation of a race, class, or ethnic group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area

*actual dictionary definition of segregation, also applies to this situation

6 0
2 years ago
Why is oligarchy important?
dlinn [17]

OligarchyHome  Social Sciences and the Law  Political Science and Government  Political Science: Terms and ConceptsInternational Encyclopedia...International Encyclopedia...The Columbia Encyclopedia,...The Oxford Pocket Dictionary...Further reading<span>TOOLS </span>Oligarchy<span>International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences | </span>1968COPYRIGHT 2008 Thomson Gale.Oligarchy

bibliography

The word “oligarchy” and the concepts which it symbolizes originated in ancient Greece. In its basic use, the word identified one of the general forms of government recognized by the Greeks: that in which political government is conducted by a few persons or families. It was also used more narrowly, by Aristotle for example, to refer to the debased form of aristocracy, that is, to government by the few or by a faction. The term “oligarchy” was also used to refer to the small group of persons who enjoyed a monopoly of political control in oligarchic governments; the term usually had the added sense that the oligarchy ruled in its own rather than in the public interest. For Aristotle, classification of governments rested on two independent variables: the number of persons who ruled and the purposes served by their rule. Oligarchy was present when a few persons ruled for their own satisfaction.

Development of the concept. The original uses of the term were associated with particular social and political regimes and with intellectual modes of analyzing them. Typically, societies were small and traditional and rested on established classes, including a slave class. Within Greek cities citizenship status often identified a large but still minority class that could at least claim to participate in political decisions. Whatever the changes in political forms, this “upper class” was relatively stable by reason of property holding, authority relations with other classes, social position, and so on, and oligarchy could reasonably be expected to be succeeded by other known forms of government. Classical analysts found oligarchies to be endemic among ancient states, but they viewed them as unstable since they rested on military, economic, and leadership factors which were transitory as compared with the continuing forces which supported the relatively large upper classes in traditionalist societies.

In the modern view, these classical conceptions, including oligarchy and the ideas associated with it, are far too simple for effective analysis. Indeed, classical writing makes it clear that the conceptions based on the formal structure of governments were not adequate even then, in spite of the particular emphasis given to form. Greek analysts dealt with the phenomena of power, with the importance of procedures, and, of course, with the paramount role of values. These matters were merged with discussions of political form, but the elements were not clearly discriminated. The subtleties and complexities of Greek political thought do not appear to good advantage in this particular classificatory system.

6 0
3 years ago
What were two immediate effects of the attack on Pearl Harbor?
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

The last two options:

- Many young American men enlisted in the army.

- Employment rose in US factories producing war supplies.

Explanation:

Millions of men rose to the patriotic call and went to serve in the army in the theaters of war after Pearl Harbor. The US economy experimented large growth rates during the war, the Great Depression ended as nearly full employment and increasing production for war needs occurred.

3 0
3 years ago
Need help ASAP please
denpristay [2]
A And D I Recently Took A Test With The Same Question
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Throughout the 1930s dictators seized control in many countries but not in
    7·1 answer
  • EXPERTS/ACE QUICKKK Those who serve in the Senate are called??
    14·2 answers
  • What is public agenda
    8·1 answer
  • Compared to the South during the Civil War, the North had more *
    5·2 answers
  • Please help it due soon
    13·1 answer
  • Which city-state was the last to surrender to Shih Huangdi before the unification?
    11·2 answers
  • Hi<br> i need help on this math problem
    5·2 answers
  • Checks &amp; Balances allows each branch of government to check the other two branches. Read the statement below and decide whic
    13·1 answer
  • According to the First Amendment, what can the U.S. government do?
    15·2 answers
  • The primary architect of the policy of Americanization was
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!