The term "thousand points of light" was used by President George Bush to refer to volunteer organizations.
<h3>What is the meaning of "thousand points of light"?</h3>
It is a slogan used by George Bush to praise the act of volunteerism and individualism.
Hence, it was used by President George Bush to refer to the volunteer organizations carry out volunteer services.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about George Bush
<em>brainly.com/question/27108055</em>
Answer:
in the northern sky
Explanation:
The Sun appears to be slightly on the northern sky during the summer solstice at the Equator. This is actually the northernmost that the Sun occurs over the Equator. The reason why the Sun appears on the northern sky over the Equator because the Northern Hemisphere is tilted towards the Sun in this period, so the Equator come slightly tilted as well, so the Sun comes to be slightly on the north. From this date on though, the Sun is gradually moving closer and closer to a position in the sky where it will be directly over the Equator, and that happens on the September equinox.
Answer and Explanation:
a. A historical similarity was the increase in the size of the USA. This promoted a larger and more imposing territory on the world stage, but it also presented disadvantages such as some problems in managing such a large territory and government spending, which were resolved over time.
b. A historical difference was that the Northwest Territory was obtained through a treaty with strictly political objectives, on the other hand, the acquisition of Louisiana was made through a purchase, which in addition to also having political objectives, imposing a federal expense.
c. One of the main differences is that Louisiana was sold by the French government, which encouraged a whole period of adaptation of the place to American culture and politics. On the other hand, the northwestern territory established a territorial difference due to the existence of civil freedom and freedom of blacks.
I believe 1 and 4 are incorrect. 4 is quite ridiculous, England won the war and had no reason whatsoever to cede colonies to the Germans. 1 is debatable, but the general consensus is that the Americans joined less to fight the "enemy over there" but rather because they felt threatened by Germany's potential alliance with a powerful Mexico and because of Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare. That said, one could argue that 1, in this case, is correct.
I believe 2 and 3 are correct. The United States did join the League of Nations after the war to prevent another conflict and promote peace (that didn't work too well). The League of Nations of the past could be compared to the United Nations of today. The American troops that arrived in Europe in the year of 1918 did indeed help stem the German advance. At some points arriving at a rate of 10 000 a day, the fresh American troops pretty much were able to swarm the war-weary Germans and kill more than the Germans could replace.
Hopes this helps:
Answer: Industrialization helped fuel the start of imperialism in the 19th century. ... Soon, industrialization spread throughout Europe and to the United States. These new industrialized nations needed more raw materials to fuel their mass production and population growth.