Explanation:Thomas Hobbes 'and John Locke's are famous political philosophers.There views regarding human nature similar at some places but at some other places they differ.
Similarities:
- Both the philosophers have given importance to human nature.
- Both the philosophers consider that there is need of government to exercise control over human beings.
- Both also refers to the risk that might arise when no governmental control is there.
- Both highlighted the point that there should be equality among humans,otherwise it might give rise to war like situations.
Differences:
Hobbes believed that human beings are not humble at all ,they are cruel by nature.As per him the fittest will survive so the need government to control them ,otherwise there will be war like situations.
Locke's believed that humans are social creatures ,they want to be the part of society.humans have good nature and they need government to maintain that nature.
I agree with Locke's point of view.His views are more positive as compared to Hobbes'
None of the above the so in union has nothing to do with that
Is there choices like A,B,C and D? Or no?
Seismograph: Showed that earthquakes are not signs of heaven's anger but..
Water Clock: Helped measure time accurately without the sun
Sundial: Helped measure time with the aid of the sun
Perpetual Calendar: Tracked days, weeks, and months across a year
Paper: Replaced heavy writing surfaces such as stone or shell and allowed for the printing of Buddhist's prayers
It means that if a country was to wage war against the United States, the president shall arrest all citizens from other countries. For example, if Mexico were to have a war with America, all Mexicans that are mexico citizens shall be arrested ( apprehended).
- R3KTFORGOOD ☕