Dear director.
I believe that you, as a dedicated and correct professional, are concerned with the well-being of students and assume the responsibility of promoting an increasingly safe and efficient school system.
As I know your work and I know that you take into account the students' opinions about how the school is working, I decided to write this letter, to ask you, dearly, to establish school block structures for the school.
You should already know with this type of structure you organize the periods of time that we students spend in classrooms and I believe that this organization is very efficient in making our day dynamic, less tiring and, consequently, more academically productive .
Currently we do not have a standard structure in the school, which leaves our school period highly disorganized and often with classes that last abusive and exhausting hours, not promoting good learning.
We have been very badly affected by this and I urge you to evaluate my suggestion urgently, please.
Regards,
Mary Sean.
Answer:
fvkbjvdfhbhfvbhvfrffrffrrrffrrfrrffrfrffrffr
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The essay initially pretends to be a critique of a type of self-improvement book popular at the time, which claimed to tell how to achieve success. These books defined success strictly in financial terms and assumed that if anyone follows certain steps, they will be able to duplicate the accomplishments of wealthy business owners. However, Chesterton’s review of these books includes a broader social criticism. The focus on the definition of success strictly in terms of money is central to his essay. But wrapped around that issue is the idea that each person can or should perceive success on the same terms as a business leader. He illustrates the point by saying a donkey is successful at being a donkey as much as a millionaire is successful at being a millionaire, so there is no point in calling a donkey a failed millionaire or vice versa.
To counter the common assumptions about success, Chesterton describes people in various walks of life and how each might more realistically succeed. In this description, he suggests that these books falsely pretend to help people succeed in their own social circles and encourage people to try to become something they are not and cannot ever be.
Chesterton says these writers tell the ordinary man how he may succeed in his career—if he is a builder, he may succeed as a builder; or if he is a stockbroker, he may succeed as a stockbroker. Chesterton increases his satire at this point, commenting that the authors say a grocer may become a sporting yachtsman; a tenth-rate journalist may become a peer, which is a British nobleman; and a German Jew may become an Anglo-Saxon. Obviously, these transitions are unlikely or even impossible. Chesterton then criticizes the main assumption of these books and the society that produces it. By claiming that average people can follow in the steps of business tycoons such as Rothschild or Vanderbilt, the book's author is taking part in "the horrible mysticism of money," in which people worship the unlikely possibility of achieving great riches.
Answer:
Grammatically Correct, (more or less) the sentence should read: My favorite teacher is Eliana Rodriquez, because she gives engaging lectures in biology.
