The answer should be D. Hope that helps?
Answer:
The dependence comes from the fact that the highest consumers of oil are not the highest producers.
Explanation:
The Middle East, as a region, has been blessed with reserves of oil. This is the natural resource for which there is the highest demand on the global market, so having it means that it brings a lot of benefits. The most obvious benefit is a lot of profit, but there is also the political influence because of the dependence of other countries on the resource.
The huge amount of profit complemented with having all major economies in the world (except two) highly dependent on oil from the Middle Eastern countries has led to a lot of looking through fingers situations. Almost all of the countries in this region tend to be among the worst when it comes to the violation of human rights, suppression, dictatorship, but all other countries turn their heads and there is no reaction because of how dependent they are on their oil. Also, the leaders of these countries are spreading out their influence in other countries by buying a lot of businesses, buying actions, sports clubs, or even finance political parties in order to make a stronghold, and so far they do it to great effect.
Answer:
1. Salts. 2. Oil reserves. 3. Gold deposits. 4. Minerals
Explanation:
- As oceans are the lifeblood of the planet they give all the natural resources that we need to live a healthy and economic life. Seafloor contains various features like volcanic vents and trenches. These vents contain massive seafloor sulfur contents.
- Also, they consist of high-value items like gold, silver deposits as these have been constantly been drilled for such precious metals. Similarly, various minerals and salt content ate known to have been found in these deposits.
- The presence of active deposits is found near the continental plate boundary. Certain SEZ special economic zones have neb thus made to help preserve the mineral and oil wealth of nations.
The Industrial Revolution made work be more regimented and less skilled. Instead of working for yourself, at your own pace, you had to work for a boss and work when and how hard that boss told you to. This made workers feel much less independent than they once had.
As for conducting business, things also became much more impersonal and regimented. Instead of conducting one's business as boss to a few apprentices and journeymen, a factory owner would now need to manage hundereds of employees.
So, in general, the Industrial Revolution made the workplace much more impersonal and took away the independence of the workers it employed.
