Mining of fossil fuels and important minerals
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Free market or capitalism.
<span>c) It facilitated an expansion of Islamic learning and culture.
</span>
Answer:
progressive Imperialism
Explanation:
According to Progressive Imperialism, the policy of extending the influence to regions in the world under the justification of opening trade becomes the norm. The military supremacy of the US enabled them to set conditions for expanding the markets to areas of the world were formerly there was only local or regional trade and together with the effort to gain economic control comes the political control exerted upon the Panama channel.
As more and more areas of influence come to be dictated by the logics of economic , the foreign policy focuses on using diplomatic means and if this fails the hard politics through military intervention and war are set.