Declaration of Independence (1776)Bloody Butchery, by the British Troops: or, The Runaway Fight of the Regulars(1775)A Circumstantial Account of an Attack that Happened on the 19th of April 1775, on His Majesty's Troops (1775)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
This was because of their geographical positions.
Explanation:
Their geographical position favored a focus on military capability. Both Rome and China were militaristic states. Both were able to develop thanks to being shielded by their geographical position from the great powers in the east. Eventually they were able to gain powers over a large sector.
No, developed countries aren't facing the challenge of hight birth rates, instead, they are facing problems like: corruption, bad policies, and lack of infrastructure along with conflict from other countries or within their own.