It showed a colonial revolt could produce a nation based on popular sovereignty
Treaty of Greenville was a peace treaty between the United States and Native Indians of the U.S. Northwest Territory. Treaty of Colerain outlined friendly terms which was signed between the US Government and the Creek people.
Explanation:
Treaty of Greenville ended the Native American war facilitating the expansion further into the west. But in true it failed to put an end to the relentless conflict that occurred between the Native Americans and American Settlers.
Treaty of Colerain is a peace treaty and a treaty of friendship that was outlined between the US government and the Creek nations. The administration of Washington had already came into a friendly terms with the Creek people however, factually the people of Cherokee nation ended up in having an endless scuffle with the Government because, they were not given priority amidst the settlers.
I believe the last option is the correct one - <span>They were opposed to Article 10 that could infringe upon the United States’ right to declare war and expand its territories.
This particular Article meant that anyone could call America for assistance in times of war. Obviously, the US politicians were against such a decision, even though France and Britain wanted to sign it. In the end, nothing happened with this document.
</span>
