Answer:
<h2>That's true.</h2>
Explanation:
This characteristics of writing are mainly used in academic papers. In this context you need to use a precise language, a technical language, because that will allow you to be understood by the reader, using less words with objectivity, right to the point.
<em>So, at the end, this technical language is with that purpose, that's why in academic context is used a ''difficult'' language, but is not really difficult, it's just using words that are not popular to explain specifically some theme.</em>
Is this supposed to be a story made up of characters you thought about yourself? not sure if that’s what you’re asking, but i’d write about the social injustice of discrimination against people of color, specifically black people. take example for the many minorities that have been racially discriminated by their looks and skin and what problems they’ve faced their whole lives over something they have no control over. outcome of the story would probably be talking ab the broken system and how it should be fixed. theme would be about privilege and suffering, identity and community, or justice and injustice. hope this helps!
The <em>predictable structure</em><em> of the </em><em>stanzas</em> in <em>"A Contribution to Statistics" by Wislawa Szymborska</em> gives the readers a sense of the outcomes resulting from her research about human characteristics.
In the second stanza, the poet notes <em>"of a hundred people," doubters are 48% (100% - 52%), only 52% know that they should live by faith.</em> In another stanza, she concludes that <em>those who live in constant fear are 77%.</em> In all the stanzas, she supplies the statistics that qualify her research about human characteristics.
The predictability of her stanzas lies in the way she supplies human characteristics and then gives the corresponding proportions of the human population that either possesses the characteristics or fails the test.
Thus, using predictable structure in the stanzas of <em>"A Contribution to Statistics" by Wislawa Szymborska</em> makes <em>reading</em><em> the poem fascinating</em> <em>and educating</em>, especially for those who read between the lines.
Read more: brainly.com/question/13866008
Answer: Hester Prynne in The Scarlet Letter spends years not revealing the name of the father of her illegitimate daughter. She leaves him to make up his own mind, and the consequences of both their decisions form the basis of the whole novel, and the ethical debates that run through it.
I don't know if I would agree or disagree. What do you think?
