Answer:
Cullen claimed that Hughes' writing focused on American life, but ignored the African heritage of African Americans and believed that this was a disservice. Baldwin, on the other hand, circled the simple language adopted by Hughes in his poems, which, according to Baldwin, presented weak, irrelevant and meaningless agendas.
Explanation:
Cullen, Baldwin and hughes were American writers very committed to the causes of civil rights and the difficulties that African-Americans suffered in a racist and prejudiced American society. Although both authors used the same themes, they approached them in different ways and with different approaches, which meant that they often did not agree with each other's work and form of writing, which generated many literary criticisms from each other.
1. I would say the correct answer is C. <span>It led him to believe that violent resistance to white people is both necessary and justified. The problem was not just the taking away of Native American lands; the problem was that the white men cheated. Black Hawk was a famous war leader in more than one conflict, aligning even with the white men from Britain and Canada against their common enemy.
2. In my opinion, the correct answer is D. </span><span>He uses ethos, suggesting his behavior was an ethical and just reaction against the deceitful and immoral behavior of the white men. He isn't trying to manipulate his audience's opinion. He appeals to ethos, relying on their capability to recognize the right and justified cause. When the land where they lived was devastated, of course they were right to do something about it.</span>
Answer:
Clarisse McClellan is Montag's intuitive teenage neighbor, who befriends him one day on his way home from work. One could argue that Clarisse is motivated to express her inherent human desire to socialize and enjoy nature. At the end of her brief conversation with Montag, Clarisse asks him if he is happy.
Answer:
The two sentences which support the overall argument with facts are:
<em>- Statistics show that most vaccines are more than 90% effective in preventing diseases.</em>
<em>- However, when people are not vaccinated, they are at risk of catching diseases that others are immune to.</em>
Explanation:
These two sentences (above) present factual information like statistics and what the risks are when getting vaccinated and therefore support the argument with facts.
<em>The sentences in between these factual supporting sentences present additional information which help explain and elobarate on the factual information provided.</em>
