Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
Answer:
the British offered them freedom. they were not able to offer an environment free of judgement and ridicule but they would pay them and that was better than being enslaved.
I'm not 100% sure on what the answer is but I think its either B or C.
The ancient document that sheds light on the purpose of the
government is called the code of Hammurabi. This is known to be a Babylonian code
in which has been preserved well that has been dated back about 1754 B.C., this
is a record that provides the people and the prosperity during their period in
which was first recorded.
