James K Polk is one of the historical figures that is really hard to judge by modern standards.
He was a forceful man with strongly held beliefs. He was the last in the line of "Jacksonian Presidents" with all of the baggage that came along with that.
Ultimately, he was a strong war time President. His single term in office led to the short lived Presidency of Zachary Taylor, who was significantly less informed and forceful than Polk. After Polk, the issue of slavery really came to the forefront. Polk was either responsible for delaying the prominence of this issue or just got lucky. It is likely that history would look much differently if Polk had a second term and continued his aggressive posture towards America's future.
I'd say he was a good President, for his time, who strongly acted on the economy and in regards to Mexico but whose record looks abysmal by modern standards and values.
Answer:
Socio-political, economic and ecological factors are the main forces driving migration. Rising communal violence world-wide, often as a result of ethnic or religious intolerance, has led to increased levels of migration. Economic disparity between developing and developed economies encourages the movement of skilled labor from the former to the latter. Temporary migration visas allow for an increase in the rate of circular migration. Changes in the ecological environment have the potential to worsen food and water insecurity in various parts of the globe. Limited access to food and water resources may push people to migrate to countries where these resources are more readily available.
Because the nazi's distroyed there homes and the shops the jews owned and it made it harder for them to make money and support their families.
Answer:
it increased competition and tension among number of European countries
A would be the correct answer. Human capital refers to knowledge, experience, and the skills of an employee.
