The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
Answer:
Explanation:I would write about benefits, like job offers and stuff like that and experiences you have in college, also like things you can study about in college. Hope this helps!!
Answer:
I am going to have to say climax :)
Explanation:
if you want you can join me group chat but i need help with this paper
Let me know :)
The correct answer is C) Mom sent him and his brothers outside to play. In the other examples subjective case is used, not objective.
Pampered indulge with every attention, comfort, and kindness
spoiledharm the character of (a child) by being too lenient or indulgent
