<span>The only time I think it should be allowed to disrupt another citizens group is when that persons group is promoting and acting upon ideas that interlope anothers happyness, property, or well being. I think if someone is wrong doing something innocent then you have to wrong do them to put an end to it. So when they say "forget their rights" you gotta say "forget their rights". It should be completely an eye for an eye in an incident such as this one. Fighting fire with fire will only burn everything down but thats exactly what you want to happen when it comes to a matter such as this one.</span>
The only time I think it should be permissible for the rights of an individual to infringe on the rights of a group is when that group's decisions will harm that person, or another person/persons. One individual should not have the right to affect an entire group's decisions or rights unless that person is in direct harm, or that group's decisions will harm a person, their property or their rights. But if no one is going to be harmed or affected than one person should never be allowed to infringe on the rights of a group. One person should never have more power than a group or then another person. Power should never work for just one person and the rights of a person should be equal.(127 words)
