Answer:
highway from Selma, Alabama, to the state capital of Montgomery. The marches were organized by nonviolent activists to demonstrate the desire of African-American citizens to exercise their constitutional right to vote, in defiance of segregationist repression; they were part of a broader voting rights movement underway in Selma and throughout the American South. By highlighting racial injustice, they contributed to passage that year of the Voting Rights Act, a landmark federal achievement of the civil rights movement.
Southern state legislatures had passed and maintained a series of discriminatory requirements and practices that had disenfranchised most of the millions of African Americans across the South throughout the 20th century. The African-American group known as the Dallas County Voters League (DCVL) launched a voter registration campaign in Selma in 1963. Joined by organizers from the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), they began working that year in a renewed effort to register black voters.
Finding resistance by white officials to be intractable, even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended legal segregation, the DCVL invited Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and the activists of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) to join them. SCLC brought many prominent civil rights and civic leaders to Selma in January 1965. Local and regional protests began, with 3,000 people arrested by the end of February. According to Joseph A. Califano Jr., who served as head of domestic affairs for U.S. President Lyndon Johnson between the years 1965 and 1969, the President viewed King as an essential partner in getting the Voting Rights Act enacted.[3] Califano, whom the President also assigned to monitor the final march to Montgomery,[4] said that Johnson and King talked by telephone on January 15 to plan a strategy for drawing attention to the injustice of using literacy tests and other barriers to stop black Southerners from voting, and that King later informed the President on February 9 of his decision to use Selma to achieve this objec
Well its not D because he forbid any bills that restricted slavery and had about 300 slaves throughout his life.
and yea so i started working backwards...
and found that C was correct he was a stubborn and unwilling to compromise. He believed that Slavery was a great thing and that the governmnet should have less power.
according to this website:
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~cap/jackson/ima.htm
the answer is C!
Answer:
who ever dose not know history is doomed to repeat it
Explanation:
The most surprising thing for me personally was the set up of the trenches, there is a very good system where the front line is the first to attack or be attacked while the others are there as backups. If someone were to get hurt within the first trench, there are easily accessible routes for the soldiers to take to retreat to safety, on the contrary, if the front lines were in need of any reinforcement whatsoever, there is a clear way to travel for the soldiers to get more ammunition or man power.
Answer:
i dont have it all but
Explanation:
Second paragraph: Discuss the separation of powers and checks and balances. Use examples to explain the difference between the two ideas.
Congress can approve a bill that will then be sent to the President but the president can veto the bill if they dont like it, no matter what.
Third paragraph: Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Federalists think Constitution already limits powers of government, and we don’t need a Bill of Rights
Fourth paragraph: Discuss the position of the Anti-Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
The Anti-Federalists Will not ratify Constitution unless it has a Bill of Rights. They feel like the government is too strong and the Constitution does not provide enough protection
