1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KATRIN_1 [288]
3 years ago
9

Considering the historian's use of source material, which interpretation is

History
1 answer:
Thepotemich [5.8K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: the correct answer is b

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which were great Muslim empires in the A.D. 900s?
yKpoI14uk [10]
The 3 great empires were the Mughal, Ottoman, and the Safavid empire.
4 0
3 years ago
Evaluate the evaluate the reasons for the decline of Mughal Empire <br>​
Tatiana [17]
Foreign Invasion. A series of foreign invasions affected Mughal Empire very badly. Attacks by Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali, which were themselves the consequences of the weakness of the Empire, drained the Empire of its wealth, ruined its trade and industry in the North, and almost destroyed its military power.
6 0
3 years ago
How was Sparta able to defeat Athens at he end of the Peloponnesian War?
labwork [276]

The Peloponnesian War (431–404 BC) was an ancient Greek war fought by Athens and its empire against the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. Historians have traditionally divided the war into three phases. In the first phase, the Archidamian War, Sparta launched repeated invasions of Attica, while Athens took advantage of its naval supremacy to raid the coast of the Peloponnese and attempt to suppress signs of unrest in its empire. This period of the war was concluded in 421 BC, with the signing of the Peace of Nicias. That treaty, however, was soon undermined by renewed fighting in the Peloponnese. In 415 BC, Athens dispatched a massive expeditionary force to attack Syracuse in Sicily; the attack failed disastrously, with the destruction of the entire force, in 413 BC. This ushered in the final phase of the war, generally referred to either as the Decelean War, or the Ionian War. In this phase, Sparta, now receiving support from Persia, supported rebellions in Athens' subject states in the Aegean Sea and Ionia, undermining Athens' empire, and, eventually, depriving the city of naval supremacy. The destruction of Athens' fleet at Aegospotami effectively ended the war, and Athens surrendered in the following year. Corinth and Thebes demanded that Athens should be destroyed and all its citizens should be enslaved, but Sparta refused.

The Peloponnesian War reshaped the ancient Greek world. On the level of international relations, Athens, the strongest city-state in Greece prior to the war's beginning, was reduced to a state of near-complete subjection, while Sparta became established as the leading power of Greece. The economic costs of the war were felt all across Greece; poverty became widespread in the Peloponnese, while Athens found itself completely devastated, and never regained its pre-war prosperity.[1][2] The war also wrought subtler changes to Greek society; the conflict between democratic Athens and oligarchic Sparta, each of which supported friendly political factions within other states, made civil war a common occurrence in the Greek world.

Greek warfare, meanwhile, originally a limited and formalized form of conflict, was transformed into an all-out struggle between city-states, complete with atrocities on a large scale. Shattering religious and cultural taboos, devastating vast swathes of countryside, and destroying whole cities, the Peloponnesian War marked the dramatic end to the fifth century BC and the golden age of Greece.<span>[3]</span>


8 0
4 years ago
Today the president presides over a federal bureaucracy of more than ________ government employees
Gnom [1K]
The answer is 2/3rds of the employees

8 0
3 years ago
When people live without leaders, or without rules, anarchy results. When anarchy occurs, every person determines what is right
irakobra [83]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Anarchy refers to the condition of a society or country being freely constituted without leaders or an authority. It also means leaderless. That's why first part is true.

Again, when there is an anarchy, there is no leader to lead a society. In that state, man becomes his own leader and choose what is right and what is wrong. That's why the statement is true.  

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the impact of the Napoleonic Code?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the europeans begin to explore overseas and what technological advances made this possible
    8·1 answer
  • African Americans gain cultural political and economic power in the Years following dr. King's death in all of the following way
    8·2 answers
  • Select all choices that apply.Mark if an event led to the decline of the Inca Empire. A. Pizarro sailed down the west coast of S
    12·2 answers
  • Easy question for somone who needs extra points. If i give someone a brainliest, is it taking my brainliest.
    10·1 answer
  • can someone please help me with this I always help ppl but they don’t do it back..,and may you please write about a cat if you c
    12·1 answer
  • Please ignore my answer and help me
    8·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me please
    6·1 answer
  • Castle William, located on a Boston harbor island, functioned as a secret meeting place for the Sons of Liberty. True False
    9·1 answer
  • HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST How did southern leaders react to Hayes during the election of 1876?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!