Answer:
Americans wanted to stay out because Congress passed a series of Neutrality acts in the 1930's, which was aimed to prevent involvement in wars, and it banned the American citizens from trading with nations at war.
Answer:
The answer is The second option: Both allow states to have power independent of the national or central government. :)
Explanation:
I can guarantee that this is correct because i simply took the test and got it correct i hope this helped you out! :D
Answer:
It was because, the Dutch didn't want to fight because, they could already see that they were out numbered, them having 9,000 civilians (some not even warriors) with the English having three times the number of soldiers. Hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
In the history of Europe, the Middle Ages or Medieval Period lasted from the 5th to the late 15th century. It began with the fall of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery.
The system of democracy was no more and the feudal system took over. The feudal system was the Under the feudal system land was granted to people for service. It started at the top with the king granting his land to a baron for soldiers all the way down to a peasant getting land to grow crops. The center of life in the Middle Ages was the manor. The manor was run by the local lord.
<span>The complete question includes a quotation and these choices: "Two years ago, the Supreme Court handed down one of the worst, and most radically activists decisions in the Court's history, Citizens United. Overturning more than a century of settles law, and with an unprecedented naiveté of the political process, the Court charted a course for legalized bribery. Sadly, both Democrats and Republicans are no following the dangerous road of unlimited money in politics. There is no question whether scandal will arise from this decision; the only question is when. On this anniversary, we call on both parties to work together to remedy the obvious damage to our political system caused by the Citizens United decision. - Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Russ Feingold, January 20, 2012." A. Allowing unrestricted corporate money into federal elections means that candidates who recieve that money are likely to be beholden to those corporate interests once in office.
B. Forcing candidates to report their campaign contributions files in the face of 100 years of American history and is a fundamental violation of an individuals privacy.
C. Disallowing corporations from spending money on behalf of individual candidates is tantamount to restricting the free speech of those running and working for those corporations.
D. Permitting organizations to raise large sums of money is the best way for the two major parties' national committees to offset the high cost of campaigns. The correct answer is A. The answer D is completely off-topic, B isn't considered a violation of an individual's privacy, as it is actually considered a legal duty in other countries, C. is a mistaken interpretation of the concerned issue.</span>