Supported by China, the Soviet Union and the Viet Kong
Communist
It was so the delegates would be free to say what was on their minds. If anything about what they said would go to the public, there would be people who would be mad at them and thus possibly hurt them. It was to protect them.
Both theodore roosevelt and woodrow wilson influenced franklin roosavelt's NEW deal ideas.
Answer:
- The plan took away power belonging to the Cabinet.
- The plan increased the powers of the presidency
- The plan created less accountability to the Senate
Explanation:
According to the question, the key reasons due to which the people may have objected to the 'Reorganization Act of 1939' include that 'this plan withdrew the cabinet's power' by 'increasing the authorities of the President' and 'reducing the senate's responsibility.' People believed that the powers must be divided in such a manner that no one takes the sole authority and more power over the other as it could be misused because this plan allowed the presidency to reform its executive branch and also recruit secret staff.
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
