Because the mandate of heaven chose the leaders and kings or the zhou dynasty lost the mandate of heaven because there were too many natural disasters and rebellions which didnt give the people the right to rule
Answer:
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.
Explanation:
Answer:
The most important purpose of government as detailed in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution is:
To establish justice.
Explanation:
The other purposes of government are secondary to the establishment of justice. The enthronement of justice ensures the realization of the other purposes. Without justice, the government will not be able to achieve any domestic tranquility. Without justice, the government will not be able to realize the common defense of all. Without justice, the government cannot promote the general welfare of the citizenry. Without justice, the government cannot secure the blessings of liberty. Therefore, justice is the fulcrum for the sustenance of the existence of every government. Otherwise, the government simply becomes a pack of cards, without meaning and order.
In one short, succinct statement Justice George Sutherland altered the relationship between Congress and the executive branch. “The President [operates] as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” he wrote in the United States Supreme Court’s decision of U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation<span>. Whereas the Constitution lays out distinct, delegated powers to Congress, such as the power to declare war and the power to ratify treaties, and to the executive, primarily the role of the president as Commander-in-Chief, Justice Sutherland’s statement altered the relationship between the two aforementioned branches. Suddenly, the executive branch had a legal precedent with which to become the leading force in foreign policy and upon which it could fall back on if actions are legally challenged.</span>
