How does the writer's point of view in "The Completely Free Market" affect the credibility of the article? A. Since it's written
in the first person, it doesn't objectively present all sides of the argument. B. Since it's written in the second person, it puts the reader in the writer's position, and gives the reader more to consider from this perspective. C. It's written in the first person, but is conducted as an interview with several different sources, providing a full-circle debate. D. It's written in the third person, which allows the author to examine all sides of the debate.
The correct answer is A. Since it's written in first person it doesn't objectively present all sides of the argument.
The reason being that the writer is basically putting the reader in his shoes which is a valid way to present his version of the story/situation however we must be aware that there's always different perspectives we must take into account in order to be objective and throughout this article we're only presented with the author's perspective.
The participle in this sentence is "sweating". It's a participle of the verb " to sweat" and it's a present participle: which we know because it ends with an -ing (past participles end with "-ed).
